Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[enhancement] "apt" addon lacks "apt-get build-dep" binding #4710

Closed
vpelletier opened this issue Aug 26, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

[enhancement] "apt" addon lacks "apt-get build-dep" binding #4710

vpelletier opened this issue Aug 26, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@vpelletier
Copy link

apt-get build-dep is a nice way to get most build-dependencies for a package. When one needs testing more than one version of a third-party dependency, this helps a lot.

Please extend "apt" add-on with a container-friendly equivalent to "apt-get build-dep".

@meatballhat
Copy link

This seems like a handy idea to me. Is it acceptable to use the existing allowed packages list for purposes of allowing build-dep executions?

@vpelletier
Copy link
Author

Woops, I didn't realise this question was for me (ie, that you actually are part of travis-ci).

I am not too familiar with the package list, but it makes sense to allow building any package which is already allowed in binary form, if that's what it means.

@nschloe
Copy link

nschloe commented Jan 20, 2017

The absence of this prevents me from using the container infrastructure in some builds.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 13, 2018

Thanks for contributing to this issue. As it has been 90 days since the last activity, we are automatically closing the issue. This is often because the request was already solved in some way and it just wasn't updated or it's no longer applicable. If that's not the case, please do feel free to either reopen this issue or open a new one. We'll gladly take a look again! You can read more here: https://blog.travis-ci.com/2018-03-09-closing-old-issues

@stale stale bot added the stale label Apr 13, 2018
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Apr 14, 2018
@dnnr
Copy link

dnnr commented Nov 12, 2018

I found this issue while trying to do exactly what OP was asking for.

I'd vote for re-opening. (Is that how this works?)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants