Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question: is ruby 2.0.0 still the recommended version? #440

Closed
peggyl opened this issue Sep 15, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

question: is ruby 2.0.0 still the recommended version? #440

peggyl opened this issue Sep 15, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@peggyl
Copy link

peggyl commented Sep 15, 2016

The README recommends Ruby v2.0.0.

According to the official Ruby page https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/, 2.0.0 is no longer maintained / EOLed, and 2.1.10 will be EOLed soon. The current stable releases are 2.2.5 and 2.3.1.

Based on this, is the recommended version for travis still 2.0.0? Are there known issues with using 2.3.1?

@lukebakken
Copy link

For what it's worth, I've been using 2.3.1p112 with no issues this week.

@mkistler
Copy link

mkistler commented Nov 7, 2016

Despite statements in the README, Ruby v2.0.0 is no longer sufficient. My attempt to install travis 1.8.2 on a Mac with Ruby version ruby 2.0.0p648 fails with:

ERROR:  Error installing travis:
    net-http-persistent requires Ruby version ~> 2.1.

@BanzaiMan
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for the long delay.

We will be requiring 2.3 in the not-so-distant future (and the documents will be updated accordingly). In general, though, 2.4 is already EOL'd, so I personally recommend 2.5 or later for everyday use.

I'm closing this for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants