-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Occurrences from new zenodo cube all over the place #44
Comments
Probably this issue is not limited to only Lithobates catesbeianus |
Something wrong has happened! I think this is a good example of why the cube should have a link back in each row to the occurrence ID that was actually used. The current lack of provenance makes debugging such errors much more difficult. |
@SanderDevisscher: thanks for reporting this. Sorry for not having time to check this properly. I will try to find time this week. Probably wednesday I will. My first thought: the random assignment algorithm used for generating cube can modify the number of cells occupied if the occs have a high coordinate uncertainty. |
I have only now seen the screenshots. Sorry! |
I would move the issue but i cannot 😞 |
Yes, @SanderDevisscher. I can reproduce the unexpected behavior you encounter. It's a random assignment issue probably as it happens also for years with one occurrence only. Notice that the problem is limited to the Belgian cube in In other words, no issues with cubes at species level of other countries and the cube of modelling species at European level contained in the same zenodo package of the Belgian one. In other words, the code is correct. I remember I had some problems while performing the 3_assign_grid.R pipeline (laptop stopped) and instead of starting from scratch again I tried to fix them in the sqlite database directly to save time. I am sorry for this. I will make the BE cube again from scratch and update the zenodo repository afterwards. No change in code should be required. |
@SanderDevisscher: issue closed automatically. I have checked myself before pushing to |
I will |
Observations of Lithobates catesbeianus for the year 2018:
vs
When I look at be_alientaxa_cube.csv from zenodo it looks like the number of infected gridcells for Lithobates catesbeianus seems to be inflated compared to the previous version.
PS not certain this issue belongs here!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: