footnotes and citations don't play nicely

[trigaten]

Footnotes overwrite citations at the bottom of the page. It would be great to modify the citation plugin to deal with this properly.

[antsanchez]

This is easily solved by marking the footnotes with a name instead of a number. For instance, on docs/applied_prompting/mc_tutorial.md, instead of marking the first note as [^1], mark as [^note], as on the following image:

[trigaten]

This is easily solved by marking the footnotes with a name instead of a number. For instance, on docs/applied_prompting/mc_tutorial.md, instead of marking the first note as [^1], mark as [^note], as on the following image:

This still seems undesirable. Additionally, where will that footnote appear WRT the citations. IMO it would be ideal to have all footnotes appear first and then citations at the bottom of the page. What are your thoughts on this?

[antsanchez]

We are talking about this plugin, right? https://www.npmjs.com/package/@benchmark-urbanism/remark-bibtex

[trigaten]

We are talking about this plugin, right? https://www.npmjs.com/package/@benchmark-urbanism/remark-bibtex

Yes, it isn't very robust, so I forked it for what this site needed: https://github.com/trigaten/remark-bibtex

[antsanchez]

Ok. This plugin is deprecated, should we first try with this other https://github.com/timlrx/rehype-citation?

[antsanchez]

@trigaten about my last comment, should I try firs with https://github.com/timlrx/rehype-citation or directly with https://github.com/trigaten/remark-bibtex?

[trigaten]

@trigaten about my last comment, should I try firs with https://github.com/timlrx/rehype-citation or directly with https://github.com/trigaten/remark-bibtex?

Preferably try https://github.com/trigaten/remark-bibtex since I have already slightly edited it to the site's needs, but whatever you think is best!