-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add more custom script hooks #28
Comments
From @justenwalker in #22 (comment):
That raises questions about the inconsistency with of the language compared to
The following is more clear, in my mind, but does require changing existing code:
...though I hasten to add that I don't really see a need for |
@justenwalker the title of the ticket may be too specific given our similar, but slightly different interests. Would you be okay with retitling it in a way that fits the conversation about pre and post stopped execution? |
This is going to be difficult to actually implement because we block execution flow on the application. Even if we could figure out a way around that, the application can "start" (as in fork) but not actually be "running" for any useful purpose. e.g. slow Java startup times.
Services deregister and then stop. Does this happen before or after the service is deregistered? |
So do we need something like:
It's not symmetric - but I'm not convinced it needs to be. Does it even make sense to run an application after the App starts? We are already polling the application, which is semantically similar to |
That's probably fine.
I'm in agreement there. |
From @misterbisson:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: