New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Define TROLIE Peering profile #65
Comments
Could you describe the use case(s) in a bit more detail? Is this part of the "peering profile" we'd discussed specifying? |
That's exactly where I was going with this. I thought it should be documented as an issue. |
Primary functionalityEliminate the need for a system integrator to connect to TROLIE-conformant servers. Improve application support and security scenarios for TROLIE peers. Given a URL to a conformant peering bootstrap endpoint, e.g.,
A Peering Profile conformance suite should be delivered by the TROLIE project to verify this functionality. Secondary functionality
Server Identity is PrecoordinatedTROLIE should make strong security recommendations (a separate conformance profile?), but authn/z may be effectively out of scope. Handshake sketchAny TROLIE instance can be configured with multiple peer URLs that must be associated with a Ratings Provider.
|
I think we should generalize this a bit and allow TROLIE clients to The use case I have in mind is just testability, frankly. Scenario Outline: Late submissions
Given the wall clock time at the server is <server_time>
And the server's forecast window deadline offset is <deadline_offset>
But the forecast submission is for <forecast_start>
When the client submits the forecast
Then the server responds with 409 conflict |
Include any API specification changes, documentation and examples for clearing ratings on tie lines between TROLIE server implementations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: