You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
The goal is to ensure that the first block mined after initializing a forking provider with a fork_block_number is fork_block_number + 1, not fork_block_number + 2 as it is now.
Something to keep in mind here is that we need need to be able to store the initial accounts and if we don't create an initial block where does this data get stored?
If it does still work in memory will it work with a persisted DB? This question is possibly blocked by: #340, if the tests there prove that this doesn't actually work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
davidmurdoch
changed the title
Investigate if the genesis block creating when forking is neccessary.
Investigate if the genesis block created when forking is neccessary.
Feb 28, 2019
The goal is to ensure that the first block mined after initializing a forking provider with a
fork_block_number
isfork_block_number + 1
, notfork_block_number + 2
as it is now.Something to keep in mind here is that we need need to be able to store the initial accounts and if we don't create an initial block where does this data get stored?
If it does still work in memory will it work with a persisted DB? This question is possibly blocked by: #340, if the tests there prove that this doesn't actually work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: