You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The height of blog cover is smaller on page 2, etc. compared to the homepage.
Screenshot of blog cover on homepage (in the latest Firefox):
Screenshot of blog cover on page 2:
You can see a "live" version of this bug on my blog here. Please note that I tweaked the capser theme so that the blog cover height is 38% instead of 60%, but I checked and this does not affect the bug in any way.
Upon further investigation, I have found that on blog homepage, the html source contains:
<body class="home-template">
But on page 2, page 3, etc., the html source contains this instead:
<body class="archive-template">
If you look in "content/themes/casper/assets/css/screen.css", search for "archive-template" yields the following:
And you see the height is "60%" here. This explains why the blog cover is much less in height on page 2. Is this "by design"? Or is the "archive-template" incorrectly used on page 2, etc.?
Thank you for looking into this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The height of blog cover is smaller on page 2, etc. compared to the homepage.
Screenshot of blog cover on homepage (in the latest Firefox):
Screenshot of blog cover on page 2:
You can see a "live" version of this bug on my blog here. Please note that I tweaked the capser theme so that the blog cover height is 38% instead of 60%, but I checked and this does not affect the bug in any way.
Upon further investigation, I have found that on blog homepage, the html source contains:
But on page 2, page 3, etc., the html source contains this instead:
If you look in "content/themes/casper/assets/css/screen.css", search for "archive-template" yields the following:
Note that the height is "auto". If you look at the main theme section, however, you will see:
And you see the height is "60%" here. This explains why the blog cover is much less in height on page 2. Is this "by design"? Or is the "archive-template" incorrectly used on page 2, etc.?
Thank you for looking into this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: