Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make branch feature/dual_kawase its own repo #23

Open
eepykate opened this issue Jan 5, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Make branch feature/dual_kawase its own repo #23

eepykate opened this issue Jan 5, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@eepykate
Copy link

eepykate commented Jan 5, 2020

It's a fork of picom, not compton, so I feel like that should be in its own repo, which is forked from yshui/picom instead of chjj/compton.

@tryone144
Copy link
Owner

I can certainly see where you are coming from, but keep in mind that yshui/picom still is a fork of chjj/compton, just like this repo is. And GitHub does not support multiple forks for one user.

However, it might be a good idea to rename and rebase my fork completely against yshui's picom in the future.

@eepykate
Copy link
Author

eepykate commented Jan 5, 2020

keep in mind that yshui/picom still is a fork of chjj/compton, just like this repo is.

I am aware, I just mean so the subtext below user / project is more accurate to where most of the code is from.

And GitHub does not support multiple forks for one user.

Do you mean multiple forks (or forks of forks) of the same project? Or total forks?

Edit: Ahhh I see what you mean now. If I try forking compton and picom it only makes one repository.

@tryone144
Copy link
Owner

Since the default branch is still based on the original compton, I'll keep the name for the time being. Once the feature branch is "backward-compatible" (e.g. the name changed from kawase to dual_kawase), I'll make it the default and rebase/rename it to yshui' picom to correctly reflect the codebase.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants