New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Swin Base or Small #9
Comments
Thanks for pointing this out! We are using Swin-S as here. |
So in the paper, did you refer Swin small as Swin base? Same question for LAVENDER? @linjieli222 |
Not sure about LAVENDER. In VIOLET, that is my mistake 😅 Sorry for the misunderstanding. |
Thanks. But also looking forward to seeing the reply about LAVENDER from @linjieli222. |
In LAVENDER, Swin-base is used. Not Swin-small. |
Hi, I have noticed that the output original Swin-Base is 1024, but according to your code, the output is 768. Did you use the Swin Small for experiment?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: