Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Swin Base or Small #9

Closed
vateye opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Swin Base or Small #9

vateye opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@vateye
Copy link

vateye commented Jun 23, 2022

Hi, I have noticed that the output original Swin-Base is 1024, but according to your code, the output is 768. Did you use the Swin Small for experiment?

@tsujuifu
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for pointing this out!

We are using Swin-S as here.

@vateye
Copy link
Author

vateye commented Jun 23, 2022

So in the paper, did you refer Swin small as Swin base? Same question for LAVENDER? @linjieli222

@tsujuifu
Copy link
Owner

tsujuifu commented Jun 23, 2022

Not sure about LAVENDER.

In VIOLET, that is my mistake 😅
I first thought I was using Swin-B, but it is Swin-S in our implementation.

Sorry for the misunderstanding.
We will update our arXiv paper!

@vateye
Copy link
Author

vateye commented Jun 23, 2022

Thanks. But also looking forward to seeing the reply about LAVENDER from @linjieli222.

@linjieli222
Copy link

Thanks. But also looking forward to seeing the reply about LAVENDER from @linjieli222.

In LAVENDER, Swin-base is used. Not Swin-small.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants