Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

exporting S1P file with sw Nano VNA-Saver yields wrong data #136

Closed
Herman-RFguy opened this issue May 10, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

exporting S1P file with sw Nano VNA-Saver yields wrong data #136

Herman-RFguy opened this issue May 10, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@Herman-RFguy
Copy link

I closed my issue by making a mistake.
Here it is again.
I compared 3 S1P files.
All generated with the same way of calibrating, and the same DUT.
one generated with a R&S ZNC-3, one with nano-VNA and -saver, and one with nanovna and sharp SW.

Calculating from the S1P files back to the marker value readings the R&S ZNC3 and the combination nanoVNA with Sharp succeeds, the combination nanovna with Saver fails.

conclusion: The nanovna-Saver software exports erroneous S1P files.
I enclose all 3 S1P files for investigation.
sharp.s1p.zip
znc3.s1p.zip
nanovna_result.s1p.zip

For a nice application, measuring the complex permeability of toroids by measuring S11
it is important to have good data, so my request is a bug fix.
Used SW version info:
version_info

@DiSlord
Copy link
Contributor

DiSlord commented May 10, 2020

NanoVNA as hardware not export s1p files
Export NanoVNASaver software, it should made correct format of file
You can try ask on NanoVNASaver repo
https://github.com/mihtjel/nanovna-saver
But as i know dewelopwer not ask ¬3 mounth
Or you can ask on NanoVNA forum
https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users

@Herman-RFguy
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your assistance, i will try the given links to find support.
With kind regards,
Herman.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants