You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following the same logic applied for equal, notEqual, isEmpty, isNotEmpty, isNull, isNotNull, the only comparator that was not reached by this standard was like.
It has an added value when implementing the library in languages where there is not yet an official Query Builder (in my case C#).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not sure which version you're using, but following operators are planned to be implemented in the next version of branch 3.x,x when I find time for it:
like, equivalent to ~
ilike, equivalent to ~~
not like, equivalent to not ... ~ ...
not ilike , equivalent to not ... ~~ ...
You can always sponsor the project to speedup things so that everyone can enjoy these new features. :)
Following the same logic applied for
equal
,notEqual
,isEmpty
,isNotEmpty
,isNull
,isNotNull
, the only comparator that was not reached by this standard waslike
.It has an added value when implementing the library in languages where there is not yet an official Query Builder (in my case C#).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: