Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Derestrict rusqlite dependency version #44

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Derestrict rusqlite dependency version #44

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jaybosamiya
Copy link
Contributor

@jaybosamiya jaybosamiya commented Jun 25, 2022

This commit removes depending exactly on rusqlite 0.25.3 (which has been yanked btw).

From quick testing, depending on the latest version (0.27.0) works too, so alternatively, you could change the version to be 0.27.0 rather than this commit's suggestion.

As an alternative, running cargo upgrade to update all dependencies to latest versions, it seems like everything builds fine (and the tests seem to produce some minor fixable suggestions), so maybe if making a new release, it might be good to update all dependencies. Happy to make a separate PR if you think it would be useful.

Thanks for this project btw! :)

This commit removes depending _exactly_ on rusqlite 0.25.3 (which has been [yanked](https://crates.io/crates/rusqlite/0.25.3) btw).

From quick testing, depending on the latest version (0.27.0) works too, so alternatively, you could change the version to be `0.27.0` rather than this commit's suggestion.
@tvallotton
Copy link
Owner

I think I prefer having a specific version so to avoid possible breakage in the future. Thanks for making me aware of this.

@jaybosamiya
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds good thanks, closing this PR

@jaybosamiya jaybosamiya deleted the patch-1 branch June 26, 2022 02:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants