Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Versioning Suggestion #38

Closed
derekprior opened this issue Feb 1, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

Versioning Suggestion #38

derekprior opened this issue Feb 1, 2012 · 1 comment

Comments

@derekprior
Copy link
Contributor

From Readme:

We try to stick to Bootstrap versioning wherever possible. The major and minor version numbers will always represent the Twitter Bootstrap version, but no guarantees are made for the tiny version number, since waiting for Bootstrap to update so I can push out a fix sucks.

Why not go to a 4 part version, allowing you to use the 4th part independently of the bootstrap version. It'd be confusing to get into a situation where bootstrap uses the tiny version number and it doesn't match the bootstrap-sass version.

@thomas-mcdonald
Copy link
Member

Since Bootstrap seems to be moving towards a three digit versioning system again with 2.0.1 soonish (rather than having a symbolic tiny version) this is probably what be doing, if needed. Hopefully it won't.

@twbs twbs locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 25, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants