Skip to content

Issues: twitter/innovators-patent-agreement

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
22 Open 10 Closed
22 Open 10 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Label
Filter by label
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Section 2(a) unnecessarily uses term "intellectual property"
#1 opened Apr 17, 2012 by mdekstrand
1
2(b) defines "defensively" differently; should use the same definition
#2 opened Apr 17, 2012 by joshtriplett
4
I think the solution is elsewhere: treat ALL patents as RANDR by requirement of law.
#4 opened Apr 17, 2012 by BrazilianJoe
2
Son (or Daughter) of Twitter
#7 opened Apr 17, 2012 by DavePitinga
3
Inventors, or inventors, their successors, assignees, etc?
#9 opened Apr 18, 2012 by stephan-buckmaster
3
Patent Troll who copies to provoke patent infringement claim
#11 opened Apr 18, 2012 by nicfulton
2
Update innovators-patent-agreement.md with initial start at breach claus...
#12 opened Apr 18, 2012 by egon010 Loading…
1
Merge inital changes, add further clarifications
#13 opened Apr 18, 2012 by egon010 Loading…
1
Make 2(b) use the definition of Defensive Purpose rather than providing a different definition of "defensively"
#14 opened Apr 18, 2012 by joshtriplett Loading…
7
Maintain Inventor's right to authorize heir
#17 opened Apr 20, 2012 by miketung Loading…
1
Is Inventors (and heirs) right to sublicense necessary?
#18 opened Apr 20, 2012 by tarul
3
Fix Twitter's Standing to Sue
#20 opened Apr 24, 2012 by jorgemtorres
1
moved paragraphs as requested
#21 opened Apr 27, 2012 by egon010 Loading…
1
Has this been past a patent lawyer?
#22 opened May 16, 2012 by digulla
4
Different approach to requiring inventor's to sublicense
#23 opened Jun 1, 2012 by tarul Loading…
4
Updated status?
#24 opened Sep 13, 2012 by tarul
4
2(b)
#25 opened Nov 23, 2012 by idmw
3
Remove unused defined term "Agreement"
#27 opened Oct 7, 2013 by tieguy Loading…
1
Should inventor in "heirs of an inventor" sentence be capitalized?
#28 opened Oct 7, 2013 by tieguy
Make substituted text consistent in styling and capitalization
#29 opened Oct 7, 2013 by tieguy Loading…
2
Ambiguous what "promises" are referred to
#30 opened Oct 7, 2013 by tieguy
1
Update README.md
#39 opened Jun 14, 2016 by ghost Loading…
1
ProTip! Find all open issues with in progress development work with linked:pr.