Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Benchmark the SemanticDB-based symbol table #76

Closed
xeno-by opened this issue Mar 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Benchmark the SemanticDB-based symbol table #76

xeno-by opened this issue Mar 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
Classpath Performance
Milestone
M2

Comments

@xeno-by
Copy link
Contributor

xeno-by commented Mar 26, 2018

SemanticDB is pretty interesting because it allows to develop tools that weren't possible before at scale that wasn't possible before. For more than a year, this allowed us not to care about its performance at all.

However, now the time has come to study and optimize SemanticDB. Let's start with benchmarking, just with the read-only aspect (since that's the only aspect that's relevant for M2, read-write will be part of M3).
@xeno-by xeno-by added this to the [M2] Read SemanticDB milestone Mar 26, 2018
@xeno-by
Copy link
Contributor Author

xeno-by commented Jul 7, 2018

Implemented in #85. See https://github.com/twitter/rsc/blob/performance/README.md for details.

@xeno-by xeno-by closed this as completed Jul 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Classpath Performance
Milestone
M2
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@xeno-by