You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 2, 2021. It is now read-only.
It seems that there is still a memory leak.
I run Twemcache under Valgrind, and submitted many small objects (a sequence of set/get of object with key "i" and random value, with i = 1, 2, 3, ...).
The memory keeps growing.
The output of Valgrind says that, when a suffix is created, the sequence of calls are
asc_respond_get (mc_ascii.c) -> asc_create_suffix (mc_ascii.c) -> cache_alloc (mc_cache.c)
but the created memory is not properly freed or managed (blocks are definitely lost).
Could you please check?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems that there is still a memory leak.
I run Twemcache under Valgrind, and submitted many small objects (a sequence of set/get of object with key "i" and random value, with i = 1, 2, 3, ...).
The memory keeps growing.
The output of Valgrind says that, when a suffix is created, the sequence of calls are
asc_respond_get (mc_ascii.c) -> asc_create_suffix (mc_ascii.c) -> cache_alloc (mc_cache.c)
but the created memory is not properly freed or managed (blocks are definitely lost).
Could you please check?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: