New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error "missing utxo" using example .toml #105
Comments
Turns out im missing the skip missing data
|
Closing. |
@CatspersCoffee yes, exactly, that's a way to avoid the panic and allow Scrolls to keep going. Just to give a little context... Some reducers in Scrolls require data from previous transactions. To allow those use-cases, there's a local DB that gets populated with UTxO as the chain gets crawled. If Scrolls starts from a particular point in the chain, other than origin, the past UTxO aren't available for the reducers requiring them, thus the error message. If this is expected by the user, the [policy]
missing_data = "Skip" | "Warn" |
@scarmuega Thanks for the reply. I have a couple questions regarding the adding and/or removing of a UTXO smember from the redis DB. When a UTXO is added as an smember (per key basis) if the UTXO is consumed by a future transaction, the UTXO still stays in the DB. In "utxo_by_address.rs", in function
But this always returns without matching Second question (related to the original question): running form Origin with a blank DB
I still get the Missing UTXO Error from the Origin and not a point intersect. Without using output:
|
Hi,
running scrolls with the example .toml file (cutdown slightly) on mainnet for Filter
type = "UtxoByAddress"
gives error:Note: this is from compiing from scratch with redis on standard localhost and port (6379). The docker image works as expected.
.toml file:
I have also tried a similar .toml file on preprod testnet and get the same error. Im either doing something stupidly wrong or missing something in the setup? could anyone advise?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: