You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What happened:
Currently, request path and query would get merged if the record's re= field contains the "?query" word. So if a custom regex doesn't need the request query but instead is looking for the "?query" inside the request path, there probably would be an error while finding the submatches.
What you expected to happen:
Find another way to pass the request query to the custom regex without checking it via the strings.Contains() method.
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
"v=txtv0;type=path;re=/?query/testing"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST?:
bug
What happened:
Currently, request path and query would get merged if the record's re= field contains the "?query" word. So if a custom regex doesn't need the request query but instead is looking for the "?query" inside the request path, there probably would be an error while finding the submatches.
What you expected to happen:
Find another way to pass the request query to the custom regex without checking it via the
strings.Contains()
method.How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
"v=txtv0;type=path;re=/?query/testing"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: