You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 9, 2022. It is now read-only.
So from now on, if a web page itself is under a dynamic filtering allow rule -- directly or indirectly, this will disengage cosmetic filtering as well on that site:
@Snapy note that this doesn't work as you expected it to work in #489: this will disengage cosmetic filtering for the current page, but you can't disengage cosmetic filtering for #.embed-twitter specifically: #.embed-twitter is a generic cosmetic filter, there is no way for ublock to know that #.embed-twitter is associated with twitter.com.
It has to be an all or nothing solution, but at least a user now can choose that all-or-nothing solution to apply only to specific web sites. The only doubt I have left regarding the current solution is whether to use the site's own cell (as it is now), or whether to introduce another row dedicated to control cosmetic filtering. To keep adding rows is not ideal however, so for now I settled to evaluate a site's own cell to determine whether cosmetic filtering should be turned off.
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: