consider avoid new, use sync.Pool instead #19

csyangchen · 2016-04-15T05:29:13Z

No description provided.

csyangchen · 2016-04-15T05:39:49Z

a simple benchmark:

// master
BenchmarkUaparser 300 3912050 ns/op 108179 B/op 414 allocs/op
// use sync.Pool + caller return *Client
BenchmarkUaparser 20000 70690 ns/op 1611 B/op 5 allocs/op

csyangchen changed the title ~~consider avoid new, use sync.Pool instead~~ consider avoid new, use sync.Pool instead Apr 15, 2016

csyangchen closed this as completed Apr 15, 2016

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

consider avoid new, use sync.Pool instead #19

consider avoid new, use sync.Pool instead #19

csyangchen commented Apr 15, 2016

csyangchen commented Apr 15, 2016

consider avoid new, use sync.Pool instead #19

consider avoid new, use sync.Pool instead #19

Comments

csyangchen commented Apr 15, 2016

csyangchen commented Apr 15, 2016