You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Please provide any additional information below.
It seems to me that part of what makes this so slow when stepping through
code is that every time it adds or changes a node, it rearranges the entire
graph and redraws it. Is there any way to make it so that a change to a
node makes an "isolated" change, so it doesn't have to redraw the entire
graph? Along with this, I can see the possibility of a "redraw" function,
which would recenter and redraw, in case "isolated" draws made for an
awkward picture.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by davidmic...@gmail.com on 16 Sep 2009 at 1:55
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't know if the Zest supports partially relayouting of the graph, but even
if it
does, we still need the delta of the model change event, which is not supported
by
the debug framework, as it only throws event telling that the stack frame is
changed,
without any info about what changed exactly.
Anyway, the idea is worth some time to be tought through.
Original comment by balage.g on 24 Sep 2009 at 8:26
I made some minor adjustments. It does not solve the problem, but helps a bit.
The speed of layout algorithms are different - generally the tree algorithm is
the
fastest, so it is selected as a default algorithm.
Zest does not support partial relayouting in general, however some layout
algorithms
are less likely to respond with global layout changes to local changes (the tree
layout is one of them).
Original comment by Stampie.hun@gmail.com on 4 Oct 2009 at 1:52
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
davidmic...@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2009 at 1:55The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: