You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Similar to #44, it would be great if we can keep track per session on a transport level how many bytes have been written and read for a single session. This will be much more accurate then #44 as things are lot simpler and all data is going through a single point (the MITM proxy). This in contract to #44 where we try to track it individually for a single request and thus not get an accurate view and even then only because we do a lot of work to try to get to some kind of close to accurate picture.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
glendc — Today at 5:05 PM
why? The socket has not much meaning right? As I imagine it is just the sockets that chrome opens in background (e.g. connections) to do its requests, which are probably several per session I imagine, but to the hero user they have little meaning individually, no?
then again, I can just sum the values for my purpose, so I do not mind contributing it as a per-socket thing if that's what you want, no had feelings on it :p
blakeb — Today at 5:07 PM
There are many per session, one to 4 per host endpoint. I think knowing which hosts are sending a ton of data is more useful than a generic overall number
The hosts level data is actionable
You could block certain urls based on it
blakeb — Today at 5:09 PM
That's at a hero level (db is only in hero)
blakeb — Today at 5:10 PM
In unblocked, you'll probably track in mitm-socket/index.ts
Similar to #44, it would be great if we can keep track per session on a transport level how many bytes have been written and read for a single session. This will be much more accurate then #44 as things are lot simpler and all data is going through a single point (the MITM proxy). This in contract to #44 where we try to track it individually for a single request and thus not get an accurate view and even then only because we do a lot of work to try to get to some kind of close to accurate picture.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: