Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Expand data type "configuration" property from one line #85

Closed
md-hc opened this issue Oct 27, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@md-hc
Copy link

md-hc commented Oct 27, 2021

For data type .uda files, would it be possible to toggle expansion of the "Configuration" property rather than have it on one line?

With one line, we are finding it difficult to resolve merge conflicts and review code changes to it.

Current:

"Configuration": {"multiple":false,"items":[{"id":130,"value":"none"},{"id":131,"value":"small"},{"id":132,"value":"medium"},{"id":133,"value":"large"},{"id":134,"value":"extra-large"}]},

Preferred:

"Configuration": {
    "multiple": false,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": 130,
            "value": "none"
        },
        {
            "id": 131,
            "value": "small"
        },
        {
            "id": 132,
            "value": "medium"
        },
        {
            "id": 133,
            "value": "large"
        },
        {
            "id": 134,
            "value": "extra-large"
        }
    ]
}
@md-hc md-hc changed the title Expand data type "configuration" property from one line Feature Request: Expand data type "configuration" property from one line Oct 27, 2021
@umbrabot
Copy link

Hiya @md-hc,

Just wanted to let you know that we noticed that this issue got a bit stale and might not be relevant any more.

We will close this issue for now but we're happy to open it up again if you think it's still relevant (for example: it's a feature request that's not yet implemented, or it's a bug that's not yet been fixed).

To open it this issue up again, you can write @umbrabot still relevant in a new comment as the first line. It would be super helpful for us if on the next line you could let us know why you think it's still relevant.

For example:

@umbrabot still relevant
This bug can still be reproduced in version x.y.z

This will reopen the issue in the next few hours.

Thanks, from your friendly Umbraco GitHub bot 🤖 🙂

@umbrabot umbrabot added the status/stale Marked as stale due to inactivity label Jul 27, 2022
@AndyButland AndyButland reopened this Aug 1, 2022
@AndyButland AndyButland added release/4.7.0 release/9.5.0 release/10.1.0 and removed status/stale Marked as stale due to inactivity labels Aug 5, 2022
@AndyButland
Copy link

This has been completed and will be part of the next releases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants