Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
126 lines (65 loc) · 14.8 KB

code-structure.md

File metadata and controls

126 lines (65 loc) · 14.8 KB

Code structure intro

This document goes over at a high level how the code in this repo is organized and comes together to form a functioning bridge. We will frequently link to spec or design documentation, when we do you should take a detour to read it.

Gravity bridge is a large codebase with many components, so this document focuses on end to end flows providing touchpoints along the entire path across all the components.

Deposit from Ethereum To Cosmos

This covers the complete flow, with code links, for a deposit. This is covered conceptually in minting and locking as well as Oracle which you should read first.

A user on Ethereum calls the gravity.sol contract with a sendToCosmos function call. This call includes the destination and amount to bridge.

This fires a SendToCosmosEvent, this event is then parsed by the eth_oracle_main_loop in the Orchestrator which is calling check_for_events every few seconds, gathering data from the operators Ethereum node. These events are parsed from Ethereum ABI encoded responses using the parser in gravity_utils.

Once the event has been interpreted it must be submitted to the Oracle. Near the bottom of check_for_events we start to format these for submission.

As a requirement of the oracle events must be submitted in order, so if a validator has submitted event 5, they must submit event 6 next. They can not resubmit event 5 or submit event 7. Since we're getting the events statelessly there is logic to get_last_event_nonce_for_validator and use this to filter.

Finally we perform the last step of this process in the Orchestrator send_ethereum_claims. This submits the ordered events to Cosmos, many events in a single message to increase efficiency.

From here we step into the Go codebase where you'll find claim message types in msgs.go and msg_server.go But these only add the claim to the store after checking validity.

Claims are added to the store with a function called Attest. This only checks that the submission is valid and stores the submission. This either creates or adds to an Attestation. You can think of the Attestation as 'a potential event that might have happened' whereas a claim is simply something that one validator said. Multiple claims are aggregated into a single Attestation if they are making the same claim. For example that event nonce 50 is a deposit to address x for value y.

At the end of every block the EndBlocker runs. In it the function attestationTally we loop overall Attestations and call TryAttestation. This function loops over every claim and determines if the validators making these claims sum to greater than 66% of the current voting power. If that's the case the Attestation is executed by the AttestationHandler.

The AttestationHandler contains a case for every possible state change required by the oracle and mints, burns, or processes an event as required. In this case we only care about MsgSendToCosmosClaim.

Here we determine if the deposited coin is Cosmos Originated, at which point we should unlock the Cosmos token we locked into the bank module and send it to the user. If it is Ethereum originated we mint and issue to the user a representative token.

Withdraw from Cosmos to Ethereum

This covers the complete flow, including code links, for a withdraw. This is covered conceptually in minting and locking, Ethereum signing, and batch creation spec which you should read first.

First a user on the Cosmos chain calls MsgSendToEth. This message will contain two fees. One fee for the Cosmos transaction, and another fee for the bridge.

By the time we handle the send in msg_server.go the Cosmos chain tx fee has already been handled. ValidateBasic verifies that the bridge fee is the same as the bridge asset being sent to Ethereum. As covered in minting and locking this is so that the relayers can be rewarded on the Ethereum side of the bridge.

Once the message has passed basic verification it moves into the TxPool AddToOutgoingPool. There is a pool of transactions waiting to go to Ethereum for every ERC20 token type on the bridge. The reasoning for this is to allow for much lower withdraw costs. Think 200k gas versus 12k gas per withdraw for a 100 withdraw batch.

As covered in the batch creation spec transactions will wait in this pool until one of two things happens.

The user may call MsgCancelSendToEth which will remove the transaction from the pool and refund the user. In msg_server.go we call RemoveFromOutgoingPoolAndRefund.

Alternatively a relayer using the BatchFees query endpoint may decide to call MsgRequestBatch. Note automatic execution of request batch is not currently implemented and is in issue #305

RequestBatch in msg_server.go calls BuildOutgoingTXBatch which implements the protocol defined in the batch creation spec. Creating a batch of up to OutgoingTxBatchSize number of withdraws in order of descending fee amounts.

Now the resulting batch is made available to Ethereum signers via the LastPendingBatchRequestByAddr endpoint. The LastPendingBatchRequestsByAddr endpoint looks up for the Ethereum signer what batches it has not yet signed that it must sign to avoid slashing see slashing spec.

The eth_signer_main_loop essentially just queries three of these endpoints (one for each type of signature) and submits signatures via MsgConfirmBatch. Which is handled in msg_server.go.

The MsgConfirmBatch handler loads the tx batch and verifies that the Ethereum signature is from the correct address, over the correct batch, and not already submitted in confirmHandlerCommon (also in msg_server.go).

At this point the batch is ready to execute and any relayer may relay it to Ethereum.

In the relayer_main_loop the query endpoint OutgoingTxBatches implemented in grpc_query.go lists the last 100 outgoing tx batches. The relayer then calls BatchConfirms which returns all the signatures for the given batch.

Now the challenge is to take these signatures and prepare them for submission to Ethereum. This is a non-trivial task. See relaying semantics doc.

get_batches_and_signatures calls a function order_sigs which takes the latest validator set on Ethereum as well as the array of signatures and prepares them for submission.

All power in gravity.sol is normalized such that total voting power is 2^64, this allows order_sigs to determine if enough voting power has voted for a given batch to be valid. This local simulation approach helps debug problems and is much faster than simply trying to simulate the transaction using the Ethereum RPC.

Finally should_relay_batch is called. This takes the batch + signatures confirmed in the previous step and simulates it's ETH cost to execute and compares that value to the value of the reward on UniswapV3. If the relayer would lose money relaying the batch it does not do so.

Once all these steps and checks have been passed send_eth_transaction_batch is called.

submitBatch in gravity.sol verifies the signatures and executes the sends before emitting a TransactionBatchExecutedEvent

this event is then parsed by the eth_oracle_main_loop and the rest of the oracle procedure has been documented in Deposit from Ethereum To Cosmos

Picking back up at the AttestationHandler the case for a MsgBatchSendToEthClaim calls OutgoingTxBatchExecuted. This purges batches that can no longer execute (lower nonce than the batch that has executed) and frees their transactions for the creation of new batches or MsgCancelSendToEth according to the batch creation spec

Validator Set Update

This is covered conceptually in the valset creation spec, Ethereum signing as well as relaying-semantics which you should read before this.

One of the biggest challenges in the operation of the Gravity bridge is keeping the validator set mirrored in the gravity.sol contract. The validator set update process is kicked off in the EndBlocker at the end of every block.

Specifically createValsets this function retrieves the current validator set as well as the last generated validator set snapshot from the store. Using a function PowerDiff it determines if the current voting power has changed more than 5% since the last snapshot was created. If so a new validator set snapshot is created.

Once the new validator set snapshot is created it is available to Ethereum signers via LastPendingValsetRequestByAddr endpoint. The LastPendingValsetRequestsByAddr endpoint looks up for the Ethereum signer what validator set snapshots it has not yet signed that it must sign to avoid slashing see slashing spec.

The eth_signer_main_loop essentially just queries three of these endpoints (one for each type of signature) and submits signatures via MsgValsetConfirm. Which is handled in msg_server.go.

The MsgValsetConfirm handler loads the tx batch and verifies that the Ethereum signature is from the correct address, over the correct valset, and not already submitted in confirmHandlerCommon (also in msg_server.go).

At this point the valset is ready to execute and any relayer may relay it to Ethereum.

The relaying is described in Withdraw from Cosmos to Ethereum with some minor differences in described in relaying semantics and an implementation in valset_relaying.rs.

Upon execution in the gravity.sol updateValset endpoint the validator set will be updated, emitting a ValsetUpdatedEvent.

this event is then parsed by the eth_oracle_main_loop and the rest of the oracle procedure has been documented in Deposit from Ethereum To Cosmos

Picking back up at the AttestationHandler the case for ValsetUpdatedEvents is used to progress batch timeouts where required, and valset pruning.

Validator Set Rewards

TODO

ERC20 representation deployment

TODO

Changing the voting power

The minimum resolution with which to represent weighted voting in gravity.sol is a mostly academic discussion. Remember that the Ethereum contract voting weights are intended to represent Cosmos voting power, but Cosmos voting power does not have a fixed amount, it's really a percentage of the total amount staked at any given time. For the sake of the Gravity contract and it's voting we normalize the Cosmos-sdk chain voting power using a constant. Currently 2^32 or one greater than the maximum value that can be stored in a unsigned 32 bit integer.

This value is chosen arbitrarily based on a key constraint. First cosmos SDK uses signed 64 bit integers to handle voting power. So attempting to compute normalized powers as the maximum value of a signed 64 bit integer risks overflow. Using big integers was considered and rejected as not worth the trouble. 2^32 is a nice round number and provides sufficient resolution for validator sets with thousands of validators.

By default 2/3 of 2^32 or 2863311530 (truncated) is the voting power threshold for passing a measure. This mirrors the underlying Tendermint consensus.

In order to change the percentage of votes required or change the total resolution of the voting you will need to modify constants in the following locations.

gravity.sol contains a threshold, this number is implicitly based on the normalization performed in the GetCurrentValset function in keeper_valset.go

This controls the required voting power to execute events on Ethereum. But events on Cosmos are governed by the TryAttestation function in attestation.go the constant AttestationVotesPowerThreshold in genesis.go notes this value as 66 note the integer rounding error that comes from multiplying by the total power and dividing by 100. This should normally be less than 1% but does exist.

Finally the Orchestrator takes the passing power as a percentage in valsets.rs which it uses to simulate voting locally and dramatically reduce api calls when trying to find a valid batch or valset.

Changing the values at these locations will let you either modify the resolution of the vote, or change the percentage to pass.