Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

error: implicit declaration of function 'idr_for_each' #384

Closed
tachang opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

error: implicit declaration of function 'idr_for_each' #384

tachang opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@umlaeute
Labels
accepting PRs it's unlikely that this issue will be fixed by us, but PRs are welcome. (btw PRs are always welcome)

Comments

@tachang
Copy link

tachang commented Nov 30, 2020

It looks like some recent changes added idr_for_each and idr_find.
These functions look like they are only available on newer kernels. I am on 3.10.14 so wondering if there is a way to backport? Or would you be open to a PR that backported it.
@tachang tachang added the needs triage new issues label Nov 30, 2020
@umlaeute umlaeute added accepting PRs it's unlikely that this issue will be fixed by us, but PRs are welcome. (btw PRs are always welcome) and removed needs triage new issues labels Dec 1, 2020
@umlaeute
Copy link
Owner

umlaeute commented Dec 1, 2020

3.10.14? sigh. afaik, the linux-3.10 has seen EOL in 2017.

I'm not opposed to such a PR, but it must be easy to rip the legacy support out again (in the light of #268 I'd rather not accumulate more cruft than necessary).
also note that there might be more obstacles when backporting than just the missing IDR support.

see also: #345 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@umlaeute umlaeute

Labels
accepting PRs it's unlikely that this issue will be fixed by us, but PRs are welcome. (btw PRs are always welcome)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tachang @umlaeute