Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature-request] Multiparty (t,n) ECDSA signatures #3

Closed
Ban44n opened this issue Dec 23, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

[Feature-request] Multiparty (t,n) ECDSA signatures #3

Ban44n opened this issue Dec 23, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Ban44n
Copy link

Ban44n commented Dec 23, 2018

Hi,

There have been two new publications that allow multi-party (t,n) ECDSA signatures: One protocol by Steven Goldfeder et al. (2018) and one protocol by Yehuda Lindell et al. (2018).

It might be worth looking into these schemes as it allows a more general setup of the wallet. I have put it as a feature request here 👍

Papers:
https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/987.pdf
http://stevengoldfeder.com/papers/GG18.pdf

@oz-mishli
Copy link

Hi,

The multi-party ECDSA protocol by Yehuda Lindell et al. (2018) is implemented in Unbound commercial offerings; these include many additional capabilities on top of the protocol, such as offline approval, cryptographically enforced risk-based policies and more. Further details are available here. Kindly let us know should you have further questions.

@TovaD TovaD pinned this issue Dec 24, 2018
@Wahahahahahahahahahaha
Copy link

Hi,
Recently have read the white paper of the blockchain-crypto-mpc library, but I still confused about that how to use BIP-Key-Derivation to output the Shared private keys x1 and x2 of wallet private keys x. I want to know hou to implementation 2-party BIP32 of the library? Looking forward to your reply, thanks

@TovaD
Copy link
Contributor

TovaD commented Aug 14, 2019

Hi,
Please open in a new issue and I will be happy to direct the relevant team member to address your question there.

Thanks,

Tova Dvorin, Community Manager @ Unbound Tech

@Wahahahahahahahahahaha
Copy link

ok Thanks

@Philamericus Philamericus unpinned this issue Jan 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants