Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

May I ask that LiftReg-noLift3D does not need the PCA method for dimensionality reduction? #4

Open
yuanpengpeng opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

May I ask that LiftReg-noLift3D does not need the PCA method for dimensionality reduction? #4

yuanpengpeng opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@yuanpengpeng
Copy link

May I ask that LiftReg-noLift3D does not need the PCA method for dimensionality reduction?
@lintian-a
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Yuan,

The LiftReg-noLift3D also relies on the PCA-built subspace. The only difference between LiftReg and LiftReg-noLift3D is whether one uses the Lift3D module.

LiftReg-noLift3D duplicates the projections to generate a set of 3D volumes as implemented in this line

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lintian-a @yuanpengpeng