-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 238
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unlock Protocol-powered, members only Farcaster Channels #13890
Comments
Assumptions (which can be revised later):
|
Hi @julien51, here's a breakdown of the plan based on our chat and the research I've done: Custom Hook Implementation: Data Extraction:
Validation & Action:
Notes:
|
Instead of a DM, can we just send an @reply to the user (outside of any channel) ? This way that would render as a frame... |
Yes, we can. To confirm, you'd like the bot to create a public cast (not on the channel) that tags the user, including a frame to do the purchase flow, instead of sending a DM. Is that right? |
@nestorbonilla please post updates here :)
That is right! In fact the frame can be "generic" (and we may let the "owner" of the channel" customize it in the future) because is the the same one that every user will user to "purchase" their membership). |
Great, sharing some updates: Custom Hooks: Implementation complete for triggering actions on new casts to a specific channel. Validation & Action Refinements:
|
Sharing some updates:
Next Steps:
|
The goal here is to create an application that would integrate completely in the Farcaster ecosystem, thru both channels and frames (and maybe actions).
Let's start with user stories:
@nestorbonilla
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: