You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering if you had any thoughts on using the bitcom protocol address as an actual output of transactions, as a norm, or in any way at all.
Doing this would make it much easier to filter on the transactions in existing wallets. For example, SPV wallets do not have access to the whole blockchain, but they do have access to all transactions for a given address. Using the protocol address as an output would open a path for SPV clients to enumerate content in a peer-to-peer way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was wondering if you had any thoughts on using the bitcom protocol address as an actual output of transactions, as a norm, or in any way at all.
Doing this would make it much easier to filter on the transactions in existing wallets. For example, SPV wallets do not have access to the whole blockchain, but they do have access to all transactions for a given address. Using the protocol address as an output would open a path for SPV clients to enumerate content in a peer-to-peer way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: