Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thoughts on Including Bitcom Address as Output? #9

Open
xloem opened this issue Jul 12, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Thoughts on Including Bitcom Address as Output? #9

xloem opened this issue Jul 12, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@xloem
Copy link

xloem commented Jul 12, 2019

I was wondering if you had any thoughts on using the bitcom protocol address as an actual output of transactions, as a norm, or in any way at all.

Doing this would make it much easier to filter on the transactions in existing wallets. For example, SPV wallets do not have access to the whole blockchain, but they do have access to all transactions for a given address. Using the protocol address as an output would open a path for SPV clients to enumerate content in a peer-to-peer way.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant