fix: use URI encoded host in web-did-doc-router

[sk91]

Closes #383

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #384 (70c0e09) into next (0bf7b24) will decrease coverage by 1.33%.
The diff coverage is 59.45%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             next     #384      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.58%   66.24%   -1.34%     
==========================================
  Files          62       64       +2     
  Lines        1530     1570      +40     
  Branches      247      254       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         1034     1040       +6     
- Misses        400      428      +28     
- Partials       96      102       +6     

[mirceanis]

Thank you for the contribution.

This depends on how the did:web spec will evolve, after which the web-did-resolver will also have to be upgraded to match the spec.
It is very likely that the proposal won't pass, because the % character is not part of the method-specific-id portion of the DID syntax.
I will mark this as blocked until the web-did spec and the resolver are upgraded.

Also, keep in mind that DIDs such as did:web:localhost%3A8080 will still need to be resolved using https, so you will need a valid certificate for localhost

[sk91]

Yeh, it seems like I was to quick to act here :)

[mirceanis]

Yeh, it seems like I was to quick to act here :)

I didn't mean to put a wrench in your machine :)
Your contribution is very much appreciated and I look forward to your next proposals!

We are fully aware that all the specs we're working against are in flux, so one of the goals of this framework is to be an enabler for quick experimentation, like the proposal you made here.

[mirceanis]

This was recently unblocked so it makes sense to merge it now.
Thank you for your contribution!