You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your implementation. This makes understanding the model much more easier.
I did notice one thing though. In the paper, the authors mention about defining default bounding boxes as priors and define different aspect ratios and scales for the same as well. Then during training they calculate the offset values between the priors with the overlap greater than a threshold w.r.t the ground truth bounding boxes and use that to calculate the localization loss.
Although, this implementation trains and works well, but I couldn't find the use of default bounding boxes anywhere.
Am I missing something here?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thanks for your implementation. This makes understanding the model much more easier.
I did notice one thing though. In the paper, the authors mention about defining default bounding boxes as priors and define different aspect ratios and scales for the same as well. Then during training they calculate the offset values between the priors with the overlap greater than a threshold w.r.t the ground truth bounding boxes and use that to calculate the localization loss.
Although, this implementation trains and works well, but I couldn't find the use of default bounding boxes anywhere.
Am I missing something here?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: