JOSE Review: Typos, URLs

[lechten]

This is related to your JOSE submission.

• In Acknowledgements, a closing parenthesis is missing (after “(BITSS)”?).
• L. 96, “The resource is designed to scaffold reproducible and transparent research workflow”: Should this be “a” workflow or “workflows”?
• The checklist asks for DOIs. Not all papers have one. Did you check? Note that the URL in Lau et al. is not formatted as hyperlink.
• The URL in Guzharina is too long. It should be broken, maybe at “-”.

[valdanchev]

Thank you for the helpful comments, which I have addressed:

• corrected the typos
• added DOIs for almost all papers (except for Hagberg et al which does not seem to be available)
• formated the URL in Guzharina to fit

[lechten]

I just tried to generate a new PDF for the JOSE issue, which failed, probably due to the subdirectory. Do you know how to do that?

[valdanchev]

Many thanks! Just renamed the subdirectory to paper, which hopefully solves this; if not, another option would be to place the paper files outside the subdirectory.

[lechten]

Thanks! Now there is a ruby exception...

I have no idea whether this is a general issue or related to your paper.

[lechten]

Actually, that is probably the ":" in the title. Maybe replace with emdash? Or quote somehow?

[valdanchev]

Totally, thanks, added quotes.

[lechten]

Thank you for the update. I asked for the PDF at JOSE...

[lechten]

Thank you for your patience. With the new PDF, everything seems fine to me. Closing this.