Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

distinguish specification from recipe #521

Closed
fosterlynn opened this issue Jul 3, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

distinguish specification from recipe #521

fosterlynn opened this issue Jul 3, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@fosterlynn
Copy link
Contributor

Discussion in the HoloREA project related to modularizing the VF software led to this thought. Do we want to split out the ResourceSpecification from the recipe? It will work without that, but it seems cleaner, mostly so that other modules can reference the ResourceSpecification without getting into the needs of the recipe.

It could look like this:
recipe-new

(Need better name for resourceRecipe property. And am not totally sure about property split.)

(Similar issue possibly exists for RecipeProcess but it is not totally the same. I think it could be better addressed when we get workflow recipes defined, where the same resource is input and output of a series of processes.)

cc @pospi @sqykly

@fosterlynn
Copy link
Contributor Author

From more work on HoloREA modularization, I think we should do process in the same way. Also some clarification from @bhaugen on what properties might be needed in ResourceSpecification aside from recipe. Looks like this atm:
recipe-spec

@fosterlynn fosterlynn changed the title distinguish ResourceSpecification from recipe distinguish specification from recipe Jul 8, 2019
@fosterlynn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant