You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The switch component is rather big compared to other switches in material design / ios etc. We have some complaints about it being too big in maas (https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1751899), so I think it is worth considering making it smaller.
Is this a proposal or an amendment?
Amendment
If amendment, what is the name of the pattern to be amended?
Visual
Provide a screenshot or link to prototype of your pattern proposal.
Context
In what context will the pattern be used?
State
Does this pattern have state? If so, what are the different states (e.g. accordion with closed/open states)?
Progressive enhancement
A pattern should be designed small screen first. How does this pattern scale up?
How will this pattern degrade on less competent browsers?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Update: I've played around with it, and although it can be made smaller, the text inside makes it look too tight. Can we omitt the On / Off? iOS / Android switches don't seem to have it, and there's an optional label in the pattern to clarify what it is doing.
2. Pattern proposal/amendment
The switch component is rather big compared to other switches in material design / ios etc. We have some complaints about it being too big in maas (https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1751899), so I think it is worth considering making it smaller.
Is this a proposal or an amendment?
If amendment, what is the name of the pattern to be amended?
Visual
Provide a screenshot or link to prototype of your pattern proposal.
Context
In what context will the pattern be used?
State
Does this pattern have state? If so, what are the different states (e.g. accordion with closed/open states)?
Progressive enhancement
A pattern should be designed small screen first. How does this pattern scale up?
How will this pattern degrade on less competent browsers?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: