Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"stop" or "pause" cluster #22

Closed
dylanbannon opened this issue Oct 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

"stop" or "pause" cluster #22

dylanbannon opened this issue Oct 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request not urgent This issue can wait a while

Comments

@dylanbannon
Copy link
Contributor

It'd be good if we could just pause all the instances, thereby putting instance costs into abeyance, without tearing down the entire cluster.

@dylanbannon dylanbannon added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 5, 2018
@dylanbannon
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is being addressed by the cluster-pause branch and pull request #63.

@dylanbannon dylanbannon added the not urgent This issue can wait a while label Nov 19, 2018
@dylanbannon
Copy link
Contributor Author

There have been a series of pull requests (including #218, #247, and #217) since this issue was filed that, in the opinions of @MekWarrior, @willgraf, and myself, obviate this issue.

Our reasoning is that, when the issue was filed, cluster configuration was a hassle, so this enhancement would allow users to sidestep not only the waiting period for cluster destruction/recreation but also a convoluted re-configuration process. The pull requests mentioned above essentially removed the re-configuration step.

So, what are the advantages to a user for being able to choose to pause a cluster, instead of destroying/restarting? In our opinion, the only advantage is avoiding the cluster destruction/recreation time. Currently, this come out to ~20 minutes, so we're going to say that the inconvenience doesn't merit the effort necessary to create this feature.

Closing, until a more compelling justification for this feature comes to mind.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request not urgent This issue can wait a while
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants