Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Things that feel weird as I try to use cross signing on 2019-12-19 #11693

Closed
9 tasks
lampholder opened this issue Dec 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed
9 tasks

Things that feel weird as I try to use cross signing on 2019-12-19 #11693

lampholder opened this issue Dec 19, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@lampholder
Copy link
Member

lampholder commented Dec 19, 2019

Many of these are kinks that'll be ironed out by as-yet-not-started work:

  • Verified sessions only appear on memberinfo in encrypted rooms
  • I can Unverify user on myself - what does this mean?
  • The UX listing unverified devices on my account doesn't look like you can interact with it, but you can (clicking it initates a verification request)
  • The modal text for verifying my own devices is the same as for verifying somebody else (the instruction to verify in person is silly for verifying myself)
  • Verifying a user or device by DM is blocked if the DM is encrypted and there are unknown devices in the room
  • Toast didn't appear
  • Initiating a verification, the message appeared in the DM (though no toast) and the verifee clicked 'accept' and then the verifor received a modal titled 'Incoming Verification' which said the other party cancelled the verification.
    image
  • Refreshing both clients and trying again worked
    • Whereby 'worked' means the verification flow completed. At the end, the verifor had still only verified the verifee's device on which the verifee accepted the verification request
@jryans
Copy link
Collaborator

jryans commented Jan 21, 2020

* Verified sessions only appear on memberinfo in encrypted rooms

This one agrees with the designs: we're only meant to show verification status and actions on user info in encrypted rooms.

@jryans
Copy link
Collaborator

jryans commented Jan 31, 2020

As far as I can tell, these items are either fixed already or intended by designs. Either way, much has changed, so it would be better to have a fresh list of issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants