Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Bug]: Installer architecture is incorrectly changed to x86 #1395

Open
1 task done
SpecterShell opened this issue Sep 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done

[Bug]: Installer architecture is incorrectly changed to x86 #1395

SpecterShell opened this issue Sep 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@vedantmgoyal9
Labels
bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@SpecterShell
Copy link
Contributor

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Project Name

WinGet Automation

What happened?

microsoft/winget-pkgs@20962c3 (#120298)
microsoft/winget-pkgs@961b8f5 (#120406)
microsoft/winget-pkgs@dc7ccee (#120407)
https://github.com/microsoft/winget-pkgs/pull/120415/files
@SpecterShell SpecterShell added bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Sep 22, 2023
@SpecterShell SpecterShell changed the title [Bug]: Installer architecture is incorrectly changed x86 [Bug]: Installer architecture is incorrectly changed yo x86 Sep 22, 2023
@SpecterShell SpecterShell changed the title [Bug]: Installer architecture is incorrectly changed yo x86 [Bug]: Installer architecture is incorrectly changed to x86 Sep 22, 2023
@SpecterShell SpecterShell mentioned this issue Sep 22, 2023
Merged
This was referenced Oct 3, 2023
Closed
Closed
@vedantmgoyal9
Copy link
Owner

@russellbanks please add cases for the reported packages...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@vedantmgoyal9 vedantmgoyal9

Labels
bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@SpecterShell @vedantmgoyal9