Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RELAX-scan/RELAX.bf results #28

Open
francicco opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

RELAX-scan/RELAX.bf results #28

francicco opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@francicco
Copy link

Hi @spond,

I'm running the Relax scan analysis. It seems like I always have different results using the same dataset and command line, also on the example data. I wonder if it is how it is suppose to be or there's something wrong with it.
Cheers
F

@spond
Copy link
Member

spond commented Dec 12, 2022

Dear @francicco,

Some of these analyses (including RELAX-scan) are quite noisy (complex models). The original README was test-run on a HyPhy release that is quite old and the new version has more stable and robust optimization routines.

If you run hyphy RELAX.bf --alignment data/Fig4H.nex with the current version you get

  1. A better log likelihood (-1614.99 vs -1616.21) for the 2-rate model
  2. The same two branches flagged as possibly relaxed/intensified and two new branches, which were marginal in the previous version
Branch Previous p Current p k (old/new)
Node 7 0.04 0.04 0 / 0.10
EU912347 ... 0.00 0.00 0.10 / 0.07
EU912347 ... 0.00 0.00 0.10 / 0.07
Node7 0.12 0.04 0.21 / 0.10
EU912349 0.09 0.01 0.22 / 0.11

Best,
Sergei

@francicco
Copy link
Author

Hi Sergei,

thanks a lot! What I'd to is run the regular RELAX on multiple subsequent branches and correct for multiple test afterward.
It's probably slower but more reliable I guess.

Cheers
F

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants