Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support custom epochs client-side #82

Open
vegeta897 opened this issue Aug 1, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Support custom epochs client-side #82

vegeta897 opened this issue Aug 1, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature Adding new functionality

Comments

@vegeta897
Copy link
Owner

vegeta897 commented Aug 1, 2021

I don't see any reason not to allow visitors to change the epoch, as long as it doesn't interfere with or clutter normal usage.

Presets could be provided for Discord and Twitter, as well as allowing any arbitrary input date.

Sharing timestamp links would have to include the custom epoch in the URL.

@vegeta897 vegeta897 added the enhancement Improving existing functionality label Aug 1, 2021
@vegeta897 vegeta897 self-assigned this Aug 1, 2021
@vegeta897 vegeta897 added feature Adding new functionality and removed enhancement Improving existing functionality labels Nov 18, 2021
@StevenH237
Copy link

Just in case you needed it: Twitter's epoch is 2010-11-04 at 01:42:54.657 UTC, as documented here.

@andriemc
Copy link

I can make a pull request if needed, this isn't that hard anyway, since you just gotta add a textbox and connect it to the EPOCH variable

@vegeta897
Copy link
Owner Author

I appreciate the offer, but the site's minimal design is a priority for me and I want to add this in a way that doesn't interfere with that. Programming is easy, UI/UX is not. I don't want it just tacked on to the page.

When I get inspired to work on Snow-Stamp again, I'll be tackling this along with a bunch of other issues in the backlog.

@andriemc
Copy link

alright

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Adding new functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants