You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The structure of your code is clear, but when I read the node selection part of the code, I have some questions:
why only Pubmed dataset uses cluster_degree_selection_seperate_fixed function for node selection, while the remaining three datasets use cluster_degree_selection
the obtain_attach_nodes_by_cluster_degree_all function has a combination of clustering and degree, and finally uses np.argsort for ascending order (scores from low to high), which seems a bit different from the paper.
Looking forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If you find any inconsistencies between the code and the paper, please refer to the paper. They have no inherent difference. Feel free to ask if you have other questions.
Hi, thanks for your work and contribution!
The structure of your code is clear, but when I read the node selection part of the code, I have some questions:
why only Pubmed dataset uses cluster_degree_selection_seperate_fixed function for node selection, while the remaining three datasets use cluster_degree_selection
the obtain_attach_nodes_by_cluster_degree_all function has a combination of clustering and degree, and finally uses np.argsort for ascending order (scores from low to high), which seems a bit different from the paper.
Looking forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: