You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently leverage talc, which is a fairly experimental memory allocator for embedded systems. Right now, we just use talc because it works and hasn't really raised any trouble. To my knowledge, talc isn't quite up to speed with some competing allocators, but i'm curious around how it stacks up against libc's malloc in libpros, as well as the performance of other allocator options (both performance-wise and efficiency-wise).
Potential benchmark contenders:
linked_list_allocator/embedded_alloc (if we can get it to work)
We currently leverage
talc
, which is a fairly experimental memory allocator for embedded systems. Right now, we just usetalc
because it works and hasn't really raised any trouble. To my knowledge, talc isn't quite up to speed with some competing allocators, but i'm curious around how it stacks up against libc'smalloc
in libpros, as well as the performance of other allocator options (both performance-wise and efficiency-wise).Potential benchmark contenders:
linked_list_allocator
/embedded_alloc
(if we can get it to work)malloc
dlmalloc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: