Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: Automatically create user for database host #220

Closed
sinjs opened this issue Aug 1, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #222
Closed

Suggestion: Automatically create user for database host #220

sinjs opened this issue Aug 1, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #222
Labels
new feature Introduces a new feature wings wings

Comments

@sinjs
Copy link
Contributor

sinjs commented Aug 1, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
X

Describe the solution you'd like
When asking for the database username, also ask if the user would want to set up another user for pterodactyl database hosts, if yes, ask for the username.

Describe alternatives you've considered
X

Additional context
This will make it easier for the user to create a database host.

@Linux123123
Copy link
Member

This has already been talked over in the #105

@sinjs
Copy link
Contributor Author

sinjs commented Aug 1, 2021

I could try and implement this

@Linux123123
Copy link
Member

I am not sure how it needs to be implemented. We kinda never ended up deciding how it would work with @vilhelmprytz

@sinjs sinjs mentioned this issue Aug 1, 2021
@vilhelmprytz
Copy link
Member

Do I understand correctly that #222 is implementing what we discussed in #105?

@vilhelmprytz vilhelmprytz added new feature Introduces a new feature wings wings labels Aug 2, 2021
@Linux123123
Copy link
Member

Yes. I think we can close #105 in favor of #222 as this is more clear where is the problem, and how to solve it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new feature Introduces a new feature wings wings
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants