lines after private should not be indented in all cases

[bjeanes]

E.g.

def foo
  puts :bar
end
private :foo

# nothing here should be intented

Basically, if private has any arguments, no following methods should be intented.

Ideally indentation after private should be optional entirely, as there isn't conformity in the community about how that should be.

[AndrewRadev]

As far as I understand your request, this already is the default behaviour. For example:

class Foo
  def foo
    puts :bar
  end
  private :foo

  def bar
    puts :baz
  end
  private :bar
end

The current indenting script doesn't take into account private, regardless of whether it has any arguments or not.

Are you sure you're using the latest version of vim-ruby? Is it possible that you're using some other indenting script instead?

[now]

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 20:03, Bodaniel Jeanes
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:

E.g.

   def foo
     puts :bar
   end
   private :foo

   # nothing here should be intented

Basically, if private has any arguments, no following methods should be intented.

Ideally indentation after private should be optional entirely, as there isn't conformity in the community about how that should be.

The rule for indentation of private, protected, and public should be
changed. The standard style is to have them at the same level of
indent as the code that surrounds it, with or without arguments. At
the time, there was a trend to dedent them one level, but it doesn’t
seem to have persisted.

[tpope]

There word "private" doesn't even appear in indent/ruby.vim. @bjeanes, I'm assuming the problem is with your setup.

[bjeanes]

Yes it would seem so. I'll have to dig in to see where that could come from.