-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
/
practical-template.tex
115 lines (84 loc) · 3.46 KB
/
practical-template.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{common}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\title{Practical 0: Sample Assignment}
\author{Finale Doshi-Velez \\ finale@seas.harvard.edu \\
Camelot.ai usernames here}
\begin{document}
\maketitle{}
\noindent This is the template you should use for submitting your practical assignments.
A full-credit assignment will go through each of these points and provide a thoughtful
clear answer. Note that the limit for the report is 4 pages, please prioritize quality over
quantity in your submission.
\section{Technical Approach}
How did you tackle the problem? Credit will be given for:
\begin{itemize}
\item Diving deeply into a method (rather than just trying
off-the-shelf tools with default settings). This can mean
providing mathematical descriptions or pseudo-code.
\item Making tuning and configuration decisions using thoughtful experimentation.
This can mean carefully describing features added or hyperparameters tuned.
\item Exploring several methods. This can contrasting two approaches
or perhaps going beyond those we discussed in class.
\end{itemize}
\noindent Thoughtfully iterating on approaches is key.
If you used existing packages or referred to papers or blogs for ideas,
you should cite these in your report.
\begin{table}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{@{}lll@{}}
% \toprule
&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Mention Features } \\
& Feature & Value Set\\
\midrule
& Mention Head & $\mcV$ \\
& Mention First Word & $\mcV$ \\
& Mention Last Word & $\mcV$ \\
& Word Preceding Mention & $\mcV$ \\
& Word Following Mention & $\mcV$\\
& \# Words in Mention & $\{1, 2, \ldots \}$ \\
& Mention Type & $\mathcal{T}$ \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{Feature lists are a good way of illustrating problem specific tuning.}
\end{table}
\section{Results}
This section should report on the following questions:
\begin{itemize}
\item Did you create and submit a set of
predictions?
\item Did your methods give reasonable performance?
\end{itemize}
\noindent You must have \textit{at least one plot or table}
that details the performances of different methods tried.
Credit will be given for quantitatively reporting (with clearly
labeled and captioned figures and/or tables) on the performance of the
methods you tried compared to your baselines.
\begin{table}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{llr}
\toprule
Model & & Acc. \\
\midrule
\textsc{Baseline 1} & & 0.45\\
\textsc{Baseline 2} & & 2.59 \\
\textsc{Model 1} & & 10.59 \\
\textsc{Model 2} & &13.42 \\
\textsc{Model 3} & & 7.49\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{\label{tab:results} Result tables can compactly illustrate absolute performance, but a plot may be more effective at illustrating a trend.}
\end{table}
\section{Discussion}
End your report by discussing the thought process behind your
analysis. This section does not need to be as technical as the others
but should summarize why you took the approach that your did. Credit will be given for:
\begin{itemize}
\item Explaining the your reasoning for why you seqentially chose to
try the approaches you did (i.e. what was it about your initial
approach that made you try the next change?).
\item Explaining the results. Did the adaptations you tried improve
the results? Why or why not? Did you do additional tests to
determine if your reasoning was correct?
\end{itemize}
\end{document}