Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Try to use squashfs #2

Open
viralpoetry opened this issue Apr 20, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Try to use squashfs #2

viralpoetry opened this issue Apr 20, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@viralpoetry
Copy link
Owner

For more info, see:
hashicorp/packer#955 (comment)

@viralpoetry viralpoetry added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 20, 2018
@timblaktu
Copy link

timblaktu commented Dec 1, 2020

@viralpoetry, I'm wondering where you ended up with this. Did you ever experiment with using squashfs in packer post-processor for creating a bootable .iso (originally proposed by @vtolstov in this thread)?

Might also refer you to my post on this referring to this repo.

In my case, I'm wanting to create isos from packer bc my team wants to be distributing machines as isos (where people may install on VM or bare metal) but in general at my company we now use packer/ansible to create (virtualbox, vagrant, docker) images, mostly for internal development environments, and I'm now looking to extend this approach to support the iso/bare metal use case as we are looking to expand into delivering environments as "product".

After re-researching this (again!), I think the squashfs approach originally proposed by @vtolstov is the way to go for linux-based images. Either way, would love to collaborate if you're still interested. Cheers.

@viralpoetry
Copy link
Owner Author

@timblaktu Hi, sorry for a late response. I never made it to experiment with the squashfs at all. I read references but my limited knowledge of compressed fs discouraged me to continue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants