You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using version 1.094, 1.02, or 1.110 of viostor.sys I get less than half the write performance compared to using version 1.074 and version 1.81.
I'm Windows 2012 R2 and Windows 8.1 instances with a host using qemu-kvm version 1.5.3 and a ceph version 0.94.3 storage backend. I have cache=writeback and rbd cache enabled as well.
When using 1.74 of viostor.sys I get the following numbers using crystaldiskmark
Test
Read MB/s
Write MB/s
Seq Q32T1
716.9
120.9
4K Q32T1
58.04
9.606
Seq
321.0
112.8
4K
5.697
11.88
When using 1.110 I get
Test
Read MB/s
Write MB/s
Seq Q32T1
820.4
41.78
4K Q32T1
64.08
0.543
Seq
448.3
38.80
4K
7.474
0.109
Version 1.094 and 1.102 have similar write numbers to 1.110
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If anyone experiences the similar problems when running the resent virtio block or scsi drivers on the latest stable upstream qemu, please feel free to reopen it again or open a new issue.
When using version 1.094, 1.02, or 1.110 of viostor.sys I get less than half the write performance compared to using version 1.074 and version 1.81.
I'm Windows 2012 R2 and Windows 8.1 instances with a host using qemu-kvm version 1.5.3 and a ceph version 0.94.3 storage backend. I have cache=writeback and rbd cache enabled as well.
When using 1.74 of viostor.sys I get the following numbers using crystaldiskmark
When using 1.110 I get
Version 1.094 and 1.102 have similar write numbers to 1.110
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: