Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

General: Possible UI/UX Improvements #215

Open
jaidevshriram opened this issue Mar 15, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

General: Possible UI/UX Improvements #215

jaidevshriram opened this issue Mar 15, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@jaidevshriram
Copy link

jaidevshriram commented Mar 15, 2019

This is purely regarding possible UI improvements that could be made:

1. Text in various experiments exist as giant blocks of text rather than as readable paragraph.
Example: link to experiment

image

Should be an easy fix, just put the text in seperate <p> tags with a couple of <br> in between if required. Easy Fix. Improves Readability.

2. Faulty Footer Scaling

On L-XL devices:
image

Smaller devices:
image

Large size of the footer increases scroll requirement, decreasing chances of clicks on footer links.

Simple solution: Apart from the existing col-md-4 class, we can add col-xl-? where ? is some number to have different widths for every device.

3. Lack of Descriptions for User

In the absence of descriptions, experiments are less likely to receive visits.

image

4. Too Many Clicks

Virtual labs requires too many clicks to do anything. In order to understand an experiment, clicks on Introduction, Objective, Theory, Quizzes. This is a bad practice in general. A simple solution would be keeping it on one page, maintaining the links as references to the page sections.

Scrollspy (Bootrstrap 4) could be used if there is a need to indicate which section is being viewed.

@jaidevshriram jaidevshriram changed the title General: Possible UI Improvements General: Possible UI/UX Improvements Mar 15, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant