You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the wonderful open-sourced project (again)!
I have a question on the potentially harmful effects of label re-scaling. The re-scaling of the image is generally fine. But re-scaling for 3D labels may change the 0 value for invalid scene coordinate masks.
We are concerned about this in our project as the training labels might become accurate after augmentation. I wondered if you have some insights on this issue.
Many thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As indicated in the F.interpolate document, the default interpolation mode is nearest. Do you think this could help to justify the regression label re-scaling?
mode (str) – algorithm used for upsampling: 'nearest' | 'linear' | 'bilinear' | 'bicubic' | 'trilinear' | 'area'. Default: 'nearest'
yes, the nearest interpolation is important to not mix zeros (ie invalid labels) and non-zero entries. Results might differ for your specific project, but we have seen no problem with label re-scaling like this. Note, that depending on how you train (RGB mode, or end-to-end training) these labels are only used as a coarse target or an initialisation. The training will refine these labels in most circumstances. The only case where this not happens would we pre-training in RGB-D mode and then omitting end-to-end training.
Hi,
Thanks for the wonderful open-sourced project (again)!
I have a question on the potentially harmful effects of label re-scaling. The re-scaling of the image is generally fine. But re-scaling for 3D labels may change the
0
value for invalid scene coordinate masks.dsacstar/dataset.py
Lines 187 to 199 in 3ffbcb1
In the loss function, the mask is used as follows:
dsacstar/train_init.py
Lines 191 to 192 in 3ffbcb1
We are concerned about this in our project as the training labels might become accurate after augmentation. I wondered if you have some insights on this issue.
Many thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: