Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why not use SyncBN #23

Closed
JingyangXiang opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Why not use SyncBN #23

JingyangXiang opened this issue May 20, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@JingyangXiang
Copy link

Thanks for your amazing work!It converges fastly and get amazing accuracy on imagenet.
In your pth file, I found args.sync_bn is False.
In your train.py, I found the model in your code broadcast buffers about bn before each forward instead of SyncBN.
So, I have a small question, why don't you use SyncBN?
Thanks very much!

@MenghaoGuo
Copy link
Contributor

MenghaoGuo commented May 21, 2022

Good question.

We ignored SyncBN and did not conduct this experiment.
I think it will improve the performance of the models.
I am going to try it now.

Thanks for your question and kind advice.

@JingyangXiang
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your reply~
hoping SyncBN can achieve higher accuracy

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants